Complimentary Client Letter: The Tax Implications of DOMA.
(Parker Tax Publishing: June 03, 2013)

Dear [client name]:

On June 26, 2013, the Supreme Court struck down Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) in U.S. v. Windsor. The decision has broad tax implications.

For one, same-sex couples can now file joint federal tax returns if the couple lives in a state that recognizes their marriage. It should be noted, however, that joint returns aren’t always beneficial. If both partners in a same-sex marriage have high taxable incomes, filing a joint return could result in more taxes being paid. For example, the modified adjusted gross income threshold amounts for calculating the net investment income tax, which applies for tax years after 2012, is $200,000 for taxpayers filing as single, $250,000 for couples filing joint returns, and $125,000 in the case of a married taxpayer filing a separate return.

In light of these considerations, we need to to assess the impact of filing a joint return for 2013. We should also review whether it would be beneficial for you to file amended returns for prior tax years for which you were married and for which the statute of limitations remains open.

Another result of the Supreme Court decision is that tax-free employer provided benefits to married same-sex partners that were previously includible in income under federal law are now excludible from income, so refunds can be claimed on this basis.

Also, the estate of a partner in a same-sex marriage is entitled to the marital deduction, which means the partner’s estate passes tax-free to his or her spouse. Other benefits of the Court’s decision include married same-sex partners now being eligible to receive federal benefits if their partner is a federal employee, as well as partners now being eligible for social security survivor benefits upon the death of a partner.

The DOMA ruling has also opened a Pandora’s box of tax questions which will be answered by future IRS guidance and court decisions:

(1) It is uncertain whether a same-sex couple that lives in a state that doesn’t recognize same-sex marriages but travels to a state that does recognize such marriages and gets married, will be treated as married for federal tax purposes.

(2) If an individual is married to a same-sex partner in a state like New York that recognizes such marriages, the fair market value of employee benefits received as a result of such marriage are excludible from the non-employee spouse’s income. But, it’s unclear what happens if the employee is transferred to a state that doesn’t recognize same-sex marriages. For example, could previously tax-free spousal benefits be converted to taxable non-spouse benefits?

(3) For the current year, it’s not clear what happens if one partner in a same-sex marriage has already filed his or her 2012 Form 1040 as single while the other partner is on a valid extension, with the expectation of filing by the October 15 deadline. Assuming they don't choose to amend both to married filing jointly (MFJ) (which presumably would be allowed), can the spouse on extension file as single or is the spouse required to file as married filing separately (MFS)?

(4) If one partner in a same-sex marriage amends his or her return from single to MFS (e.g. to reclaim imputed income from a spouse’s employment benefits), it’s unclear whether the other is also forced to amend his or her return.

(5) It’s unclear what happens in a situation where a same-sex couple has a child and one spouse filed as head of household in prior years and received child tax credits and earned income credits. For example, is the couple now required to amend as MFJ or MFS and could the spouse who took the credits be forced to return such credits?

(6) From an employer’s perspective, it’s uncertain how the Windsor decision will affect employment benefit plans for employers in different states. For example, will private companies need to consider providing spousal benefits to same-sex married employees regardless of which state the employee lives in?

I expect there will be a lot of future guidance on these and other issues.

While the full impact of the Supreme Court’s decision will not be known for a while, there are important and time-sensitive planning opportunities available now with respect to your taxes.

Please call me at your earliest convenience so we can discuss the impact this decision has on your particular situation.

Sincerely,

[Your Name, Your Firm]

- END -

Staff Editor Parker Tax Publishing

Read Parker's Latest In-Depth Article about the DOMA ruling.

Disclaimer: This publication does not, and is not intended to, provide legal, tax or accounting advice, and readers should consult their tax advisors concerning the application of tax laws to their particular situations. This analysis is not tax advice and is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for purposes of avoiding tax penalties that may be imposed on any taxpayer. The information contained herein is general in nature and based on authorities that are subject to change. Parker Tax Publishing guarantees neither the accuracy nor completeness of any information and is not responsible for any errors or omissions, or for results obtained by others as a result of reliance upon such information. Parker Tax Publishing assumes no obligation to inform the reader of any changes in tax laws or other factors that could affect information contained herein.

Parker Tax Pro Library - An Affordable Professional Tax Research Solution. www.parkertaxpublishing.com

We hope you find our professional tax research articles comprehensive and informative. Parker Tax Pro Library gives you unlimited online access all of our past Biweekly Tax Bulletins, 22 volumes of expert analysis, 250 Client Letters, Bob Jennings Practice Aids, time saving election statements and our comprehensive, fully updated primary source library.

Try Our Easy, Powerful Search Engine

A Professional Tax Research Solution that gives you instant access to 22 volumes of expert analysis and 185,000 authoritative source documents. But having access won’t help if you can’t quickly and easily find the materials that answer your questions. That’s where Parker’s search engine – and it’s uncanny knack for finding the right documents – comes into play

Things that take half a dozen steps in other products take two steps in ours. Search results come up instantly and browsing them is a cinch. So is linking from Parker’s analysis to practice aids and cited primary source documents. Parker’s powerful, user-friendly search engine ensures that you quickly find what you need every time you visit Our Tax Research Library.

Dear Tax Professional,

My name is James Levey, and a few years back I founded a company named Kleinrock Publishing. I started Kleinrock out of frustration with the prohibitively high prices and difficult search engines of BNA, CCH, and RIA tax research products ... kind of reminiscent of the situation practitioners face today.

Now that Kleinrock has disappeared into CCH, prices are soaring again and ease-of-use has fallen by the wayside. The needs of smaller firms and sole practitioners are simply not being met.

To address the problem, I’ve partnered with a group of highly talented tax writers to create Parker Tax Publishing ... a company dedicated to the idea that comprehensive, authoritative tax information service can be both easy-to-use and highly affordable.

Our product, the Parker Tax Pro Library, is breathtaking in its scope. Check out the contents listing to the left to get a sense of all the valuable material you'll have access to when you subscribe.

Or better yet, take a minute to sign yourself up for a free trial, so you can experience first-hand just how easy it is to get results with the Pro Library!

Sincerely,

James Levey

Parker Tax Pro Library - An Affordable Professional Tax Research Solution. www.parkertaxpublishing.com