Professional Tax Research Solutions from the Founder of Kleinrock. tax and accounting research
Parker Tax Pro Library
Accounting News Tax Analysts professional tax research software Like us on Facebook Follow us on Twitter View our profile on LinkedIn Find us on Pinterest
federal tax research
Professional Tax Software
tax and accounting
Tax Research Articles Tax Research Parker's Tax Research Articles Accounting Research CPA Client Letters Tax Research Software Client Testimonials Tax Research Software Federal Tax Research tax research


Accounting Software for Accountants, CPA, Bookeepers, and Enrolled Agents

CPA Tax Software

        

 

IRS Issues Proposed Regs Applying Supreme Court Decisions on Same-Sex Marriage.

(Parker Tax Publishing November 4, 2015)

The IRS has issued proposed regulations that reflect the holdings of Obergefell v. Hodges, Windsor v. United States, and Rev. Rul. 2013-17. The proposed regs define terms in the Code describing the marital status of taxpayers in a gender-neutral way. The IRS also reiterates that domestic partnerships, civil unions, or other similar relationships are not considered "marriage" for federal tax purposes. REG-148998-13.

.

Background

On June 26, 2013, the Supreme Court in United States v. Windsor, 2013 PTC 167 (S. Ct. 2013), held that Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act, which generally prohibited the federal government from recognizing the marriages of same-sex couples, was unconstitutional because it violated the principles of equal protection and due process. Rev. Rul. 2013-17 provided guidance on the Windsor decision's effect on the IRS's interpretation of Code sections that refer to taxpayers' marital status. In the revenue ruling, the IRS ruled that if a same-sex couple is married in a state that recognizes such marriages, that marriage will be recognized for all federal purposes, no matter where the couple lives.

On June 26, 2015, the Supreme Court in Obergefell v. Hodges, 2015 PTC 380 S. Ct. (2015), held that state laws are "invalid to the extent they exclude same-sex couples from civil marriage on the same terms and conditions as opposite-sex couples" and "that there is no lawful basis for a State to refuse to recognize a lawful same-sex marriage performed in another State on the ground of its same-sex character."

In light of the holdings of Windsor and Obergefell, the IRS determined that, for federal tax purposes, marriages of couples of the same-sex should be treated the same as marriages of couples of the opposite-sex and that, for reasons set forth in Rev. Rul. 2013-17, terms indicating sex, such as "husband," "wife," and "husband and wife," should be interpreted in a neutral way to include same-sex spouses as well as opposite-sex spouses.

The proposed regulations are effective when finalized. Once the proposed regulations are published as final regulations, Rev. Rul. 2013-17 will be obsolete, but taxpayers may continue to rely on the ruling's guidance until then.

Proposed Regs Define Terms Relating to Marital Status

The proposed regs amend the current regulations under Code Sec. 7701 to provide that, for federal tax purposes, the terms "spouse," "husband," and "wife" mean an individual lawfully married to another individual, and the term "husband and wife" means two individuals lawfully married to each other. These definitions apply regardless of sex.

In addition, the proposed regs provide that a marriage of two individuals will be recognized for federal tax purposes if that marriage would be recognized by any state, possession, or territory of the U.S. Under this rule, whether a marriage conducted in a foreign jurisdiction will be recognized for federal tax purposes depends on whether that marriage would be recognized in at least one state, possession, or territory of the U.S.

Although the proposed regulations define terms relating to marital status for federal tax purposes, the IRS may provide additional guidance as needed. For example, in Notice 2014-19 the IRS issued more particular guidance for employers regarding the application of Rev. Rul. 2013-17 to qualified retirement plans, and that guidance remains in effect.

Registered Domestic Partnerships, Civil Unions, or Other Similar Relationships Are Not Denominated as Marriage

The IRS noted that some couples choose to enter into a civil union or registered domestic partnership even when they could have married, and some couples who are in a civil union or registered domestic partnership choose not to convert those relationships into a marriage even when they have had the opportunity to do so. In many cases, such choices are deliberate, and couples who enter into civil unions or registered domestic partnerships may have done so with the expectation that their relationship will not be treated as a marriage for purposes of federal law.

The IRS observed that, for some of these couples, there are benefits to being in a relationship that provides some, but not all, of the protections and responsibilities of marriage. For example, some individuals who were previously married and receive Social Security benefits as a result of their previous marriage may choose to enter into a civil union or registered domestic partnership (instead of a marriage) so that they do not lose their Social Security benefits. More generally, the rates at which some couples' income is taxed may increase if they are considered married and thus required to file a married-filing-separately or married-filing-jointly federal income tax return.

The IRS said that treating couples in civil unions and registered domestic partnerships the same as married couples who are in a relationship denominated as marriage under state law could undermine the expectations certain couples have regarding the scope of their relationship. Further, no provision of the Code indicates that Congress intended to recognize as marriages civil unions, registered domestic partnerships, or similar relationships.

Accordingly, the IRS has stated that for federal tax purposes, the term "marriage" does not include registered domestic partnerships, civil unions, or other similar relationships recognized under state law that are not denominated as a marriage under that state's law, and the terms "spouse," "husband and wife," "husband," and "wife" do not include individuals who have entered into such a relationship. (Staff Editor Parker Tax Publishing)

Disclaimer: This publication does not, and is not intended to, provide legal, tax or accounting advice, and readers should consult their tax advisors concerning the application of tax laws to their particular situations. This analysis is not tax advice and is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for purposes of avoiding tax penalties that may be imposed on any taxpayer. The information contained herein is general in nature and based on authorities that are subject to change. Parker Tax Publishing guarantees neither the accuracy nor completeness of any information and is not responsible for any errors or omissions, or for results obtained by others as a result of reliance upon such information. Parker Tax Publishing assumes no obligation to inform the reader of any changes in tax laws or other factors that could affect information contained herein.

Parker Tax Pro Library - An Affordable Professional Tax Research Solution. www.parkertaxpublishing.com


Professional tax research

We hope you find our professional tax research articles comprehensive and informative. Parker Tax Pro Library gives you unlimited online access all of our past Biweekly Tax Bulletins, 22 volumes of expert analysis, 250 Client Letters, Bob Jennings Practice Aids, time saving election statements and our comprehensive, fully updated primary source library.

Parker Tax Research

Try Our Easy, Powerful Search Engine

A Professional Tax Research Solution that gives you instant access to 22 volumes of expert analysis and 185,000 authoritative source documents. But having access won’t help if you can’t quickly and easily find the materials that answer your questions. That’s where Parker’s search engine – and it’s uncanny knack for finding the right documents – comes into play

Things that take half a dozen steps in other products take two steps in ours. Search results come up instantly and browsing them is a cinch. So is linking from Parker’s analysis to practice aids and cited primary source documents. Parker’s powerful, user-friendly search engine ensures that you quickly find what you need every time you visit Our Tax Research Library.

Parker Tax Research Library

Dear Tax Professional,

My name is James Levey, and a few years back I founded a company named Kleinrock Publishing. I started Kleinrock out of frustration with the prohibitively high prices and difficult search engines of BNA, CCH, and RIA tax research products ... kind of reminiscent of the situation practitioners face today.

Now that Kleinrock has disappeared into CCH, prices are soaring again and ease-of-use has fallen by the wayside. The needs of smaller firms and sole practitioners are simply not being met.

To address the problem, I’ve partnered with a group of highly talented tax writers to create Parker Tax Publishing ... a company dedicated to the idea that comprehensive, authoritative tax information service can be both easy-to-use and highly affordable.

Our product, the Parker Tax Pro Library, is breathtaking in its scope. Check out the contents listing to the left to get a sense of all the valuable material you'll have access to when you subscribe.

Or better yet, take a minute to sign yourself up for a free trial, so you can experience first-hand just how easy it is to get results with the Pro Library!

Sincerely,

James Levey

Parker Tax Pro Library - An Affordable Professional Tax Research Solution. www.parkertaxpublishing.com

    ®2012-2016 Parker Tax Publishing. Use of content subject to Website Terms and Conditions.

IRS Codes and Regs
Tax Court Cases IRS guidance