Professional Tax Research Solutions from the Founder of Kleinrock. tax research
Parker Tax Pro Library
Accounting News Tax Analysts professional tax research software Like us on Facebook Follow us on Twitter View our profile on LinkedIn Find us on Pinterest
CPA software
Professional Tax Software
tax and accounting
Tax Research Articles Tax Research Parker's Tax Research Articles Accounting Research CPA Client Letters Tax Research Software Client Testimonials Tax Research Software tax research


Accounting Software for Accountants, CPA, Bookeepers, and Enrolled Agents

CPA Tax Software

        

 

Software Licensing Arrangement Qualifies for Domestic Production Activities Deduction. (Parker Tax Publishing December 2, 2014)

A taxpayer's revenue from licensing software to contracting parties who use the software to perform services for end users qualified as gross receipts for purposes of the Code Sec. 199 domestic production activities deduction. The taxpayer's license to end users did not mean the taxpayer was providing services to the end users. TAM 201445010 (11/07/14).

The taxpayer designs, develops, and licenses unique computer software for certain contracting parties. End users subscribe to a product or service by entering into a subscriber agreement with both the taxpayer and the respective contracting party. Under such an agreement, an end user submits a service request to the contracting party, who then uses the licensed computer software and their own data to perform the requested service, providing the end user with the results. In some cases, the taxpayer grants the end user a license to use the results. Under the subscriber agreement, the contracting party collects fees from the end users, and pays the taxpayer an amount as provided under the respective master agreement. From time to time, a contracting party will ask the taxpayer to waive the fees relating to the services performed for certain end user projects. The taxpayer's agreement to waive its fees is documented in a letter addressed to the contracting party and is described as a "royalty waiver."

The IRS's Large Business and International (LB&I) division maintained that the taxpayer derives its gross receipts directly from end users as a result of services provided by the taxpayer, and receives no compensation from the contracting parties for the license of computer software. The taxpayer's position was that it derives gross receipts directly from the license of computer software to the contracting parties. The issue before the IRS's National Office was whether, for purposes of the domestic production activities deduction under Code Sec. 199, the taxpayer derived domestic production gross receipts (DGPR) from the license of computer software to contracting parties, or non-DPGR from providing services to end users.

Code Sec. 199(a)(1) allows a deduction equal to 9 percent of the lesser of the taxpayer's:

(1) qualified production activities income (QPAI) for the tax year, or

(2) taxable income for the tax year.

Code Sec. 199(c)(1) defines QPAI for any tax year as an amount equal to the excess (if any) of (1) the taxpayer's DPGR for that tax year, over (2) the sum of (i) the cost of goods sold that are allocable to such receipts; and (ii) other expenses, losses, or deductions that are properly allocable to such receipts.

Code Sec. 199(c)(4)(A)(i)(I) defines DPGR to mean the taxpayer's gross receipts derived from any lease, rental, license, sale, exchange, or other disposition of qualifying production property (QPP) that was manufactured, produced, grown, or extracted (MPGE) by the taxpayer in whole or in significant part within the United States. Code Sec.199(c)(5) defines QPP to include computer software.

The IRS rejected the LB&I division's position, concluding that the taxpayer did derive DPGR from the license of computer software to the contracting parties for the years involved and was thus entitled to deductions under Code Sec. 199.

The IRS noted that the taxpayer's relationships with the contracting parties were not joint ventures. Rather, the agreements were transactions that generally occurred in two steps, with each party performing discrete activities. First, the taxpayer produces computer software for a contracting party, and then licenses that software to that party. Second, the contracting parties use the computer software and its own data to provide services to end users. The IRS also noted that the use of the contracting party's own data in conjunction with the licensed software showed that the services performed for the end users required both the contracting party and the taxpayer, and the taxpayer could not have performed such services on its own. In the IRS's view, the substance of the taxpayer's relationship with the contracting parties was that the taxpayer simply produces the computer software used by the contracting parties to provide services to end users.

The IRS disagreed with LB&I that the taxpayer's license to end users meant the taxpayer was providing services to the end users. Instead, the license indicates the limits of the license provided by the taxpayer to the contracting parties.

The IRS found that the master agreements allow the contracting parties to use the computer software to provide the services to end users only so as long as the taxpayer was able to restrict an end users rights with respect to the results. Thus, the IRS concluded that the taxpayer was directly paid by the contracting parties for the license of computer software, which led to the taxpayer receiving DPGR.

For a discussion of Code Sec. 199 domestic production activities deductions, see Parker Tax ¶96,101. (Staff Editor Parker Tax Publishing)

Disclaimer: This publication does not, and is not intended to, provide legal, tax or accounting advice, and readers should consult their tax advisors concerning the application of tax laws to their particular situations. This analysis is not tax advice and is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for purposes of avoiding tax penalties that may be imposed on any taxpayer. The information contained herein is general in nature and based on authorities that are subject to change. Parker Tax Publishing guarantees neither the accuracy nor completeness of any information and is not responsible for any errors or omissions, or for results obtained by others as a result of reliance upon such information. Parker Tax Publishing assumes no obligation to inform the reader of any changes in tax laws or other factors that could affect information contained herein.

Parker Tax Pro Library - An Affordable Professional Tax Research Solution. www.parkertaxpublishing.com


Professional tax research

We hope you find our professional tax research articles comprehensive and informative. Parker Tax Pro Library gives you unlimited online access all of our past Biweekly Tax Bulletins, 22 volumes of expert analysis, 250 Client Letters, Bob Jennings Practice Aids, time saving election statements and our comprehensive, fully updated primary source library.

Parker Tax Research

Try Our Easy, Powerful Search Engine

A Professional Tax Research Solution that gives you instant access to 22 volumes of expert analysis and 185,000 authoritative source documents. But having access won’t help if you can’t quickly and easily find the materials that answer your questions. That’s where Parker’s search engine – and it’s uncanny knack for finding the right documents – comes into play

Things that take half a dozen steps in other products take two steps in ours. Search results come up instantly and browsing them is a cinch. So is linking from Parker’s analysis to practice aids and cited primary source documents. Parker’s powerful, user-friendly search engine ensures that you quickly find what you need every time you visit Our Tax Research Library.

Parker Tax Research Library

Dear Tax Professional,

My name is James Levey, and a few years back I founded a company named Kleinrock Publishing. I started Kleinrock out of frustration with the prohibitively high prices and difficult search engines of BNA, CCH, and RIA tax research products ... kind of reminiscent of the situation practitioners face today.

Now that Kleinrock has disappeared into CCH, prices are soaring again and ease-of-use has fallen by the wayside. The needs of smaller firms and sole practitioners are simply not being met.

To address the problem, I’ve partnered with a group of highly talented tax writers to create Parker Tax Publishing ... a company dedicated to the idea that comprehensive, authoritative tax information service can be both easy-to-use and highly affordable.

Our product, the Parker Tax Pro Library, is breathtaking in its scope. Check out the contents listing to the left to get a sense of all the valuable material you'll have access to when you subscribe.

Or better yet, take a minute to sign yourself up for a free trial, so you can experience first-hand just how easy it is to get results with the Pro Library!

Sincerely,

James Levey

Parker Tax Pro Library - An Affordable Professional Tax Research Solution. www.parkertaxpublishing.com

    ®2012-2016 Parker Tax Publishing. Use of content subject to Website Terms and Conditions.

IRS Codes and Regs
Tax Court Cases IRS guidance