Professional Tax Research Solutions from the Founder of Kleinrock. tax research
Parker Tax Pro Library
Accounting News Tax Analysts professional tax research software Like us on Facebook Follow us on Twitter View our profile on LinkedIn Find us on Pinterest
CPA software
Professional Tax Software
tax and accounting
Tax Research Articles Tax Research Parker's Tax Research Articles Accounting Research CPA Client Letters Tax Research Software Client Testimonials Tax Research Software tax research


Accounting Software for Accountants, CPA, Bookeepers, and Enrolled Agents

CPA Tax Software

        

 

Court Dismisses Suits Over Alleged IRS Mishandling of Requests for Tax-Exempt Status.
(Parker Tax Publishing November 14, 2014)

The District Court for the District of Columbia dismissed nine allegations from 41 conservative organizations regarding alleged IRS misconduct relating to their requests for tax-exemption, for lack of jurisdiction and failure to state cognizable claims. Linchpins of Liberty v. U.S., 2014 PTC 552 (D. D.C. 10/23/14).

Forty-one organizations that sought or are still seeking tax-exempt status from the IRS filed a civil action against the United States, the IRS, and several IRS officials in their official and individual capacities, alleging multiple constitutional and statutory violations. The lawsuits sought both injunctive relief and monetary damages.

The organizations alleged that as early as February 2010, the IRS began identifying tax-exempt applications for additional scrutiny, including issuing letter requests for additional information from organizations with conservative-sounding names. An IRS "Be On The Lookout" (BOLO) list allegedly contained terms that would identify organizations with conservative-sounding names that had applied for tax-exempt status under Code Secs. 501(c)(3) or 501(c)(4).

According to the organizations, IRS officials pulled applications from conservative organizations, delayed processing those applications for sometimes well over a year, and then made harassing, probing, and unconstitutional requests for additional information. The organizations claimed this had a dramatic impact on targeted groups, causing many to curtail lawful activities, expend considerable unnecessary funds, lose donor support, and devote countless hours to responding to onerous IRS information requests that were outside the scope of legitimate inquiry.

After the organizations instituted this action, the IRS publicly released a memorandum on its website stating that the challenged IRS scheme had been suspended as of June 20, 2013, and that remedial steps had been taken to address the scheme. The IRS sought dismissal of the complaints.

After examining the allegations, the district court granted the IRS's motions to dismiss, finding that the court either did not have jurisdiction to hear the complaints or the complaints failed to state a cognizable claim.

For counts one through three of the complaint, the organizations sought monetary remedy, commonly known as a Bivens remedy. However, the court noted that circuit court precedent did not permit a Bivens remedy against the individual IRS defendants. A recent D.C. circuit case, Kim v. U.S., 632 F.3d 713 (2011), dealt with a similar situation where taxpayers sought monetary relief from IRS employees for alleged unconstitutional conduct. In that case, the court noted that it was well established that Bivens remedies do not exist against officials sued in their official capacities. As the court found no compelling reason to depart from this precedent, it dismissed counts one through three for failure to state a cognizable claim (in effect, concluding that the complaints did not contain enough factual matter to make a plausible case).

In counts four through seven of the complaint, the organizations sought declaratory and injunctive relief for the IRS's violations of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA), based on the implementation of the BOLO policy. The court noted, however, that unless an actual, ongoing controversy exists, the court was without power to decide it. As the IRS had already publicly announced that it had suspended the unconstitutional conduct complained of by the organizations and implemented changes to the tax-exempt review process to assure the public that the conduct would not recur, the court dismissed counts four through seven for lack of jurisdiction.

The eighth count in the complaint was brought on behalf of the four organizations that were still awaiting a determination of their tax-exempt status under Code Sec. 501(c)(3). As two of the organizations were granted tax-exempt status after the complaint was filed, the court dismissed this count with respect to those organizations. The matter remains open with respect to the remaining two organizations.

In count nine of the complaint, the organizations sought monetary judgments under Code Sec. 7432 against the IRS due to its allegedly illegal obtainment, inspection, handling, and disclosure of the organizations' tax return information, in violation of Code Sec. 6103. The court, however, pointed out that Code Sec. 6103 addresses improper disclosure of tax return information, not improper obtainment of related information. Thus, the court noted, although the organizations challenged the IRS's inspection of their tax return information, it was actually the IRS's alleged unconstitutional conduct in acquiring that information that formed the basis for count nine.

In the court's view, there is a clear dichotomy between the means by which tax return information is acquired and the disclosure or inspection of that information thereafter; thus, the validity of the means by which the return information was disclosed was irrelevant to whether the disclosure of the information violated Code Sec. 6103. As the organizations were unable to show that the IRS either improperly obtained tax return information or improperly disclosed that information, the court dismissed count nine for failure to state a proper claim for relief. (Staff Editor Parker Tax Publishing)

Disclaimer: This publication does not, and is not intended to, provide legal, tax or accounting advice, and readers should consult their tax advisors concerning the application of tax laws to their particular situations. This analysis is not tax advice and is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for purposes of avoiding tax penalties that may be imposed on any taxpayer. The information contained herein is general in nature and based on authorities that are subject to change. Parker Tax Publishing guarantees neither the accuracy nor completeness of any information and is not responsible for any errors or omissions, or for results obtained by others as a result of reliance upon such information. Parker Tax Publishing assumes no obligation to inform the reader of any changes in tax laws or other factors that could affect information contained herein.

Parker Tax Pro Library - An Affordable Professional Tax Research Solution. www.parkertaxpublishing.com


Professional tax research

We hope you find our professional tax research articles comprehensive and informative. Parker Tax Pro Library gives you unlimited online access all of our past Biweekly Tax Bulletins, 22 volumes of expert analysis, 250 Client Letters, Bob Jennings Practice Aids, time saving election statements and our comprehensive, fully updated primary source library.

Parker Tax Research

Try Our Easy, Powerful Search Engine

A Professional Tax Research Solution that gives you instant access to 22 volumes of expert analysis and 185,000 authoritative source documents. But having access won’t help if you can’t quickly and easily find the materials that answer your questions. That’s where Parker’s search engine – and it’s uncanny knack for finding the right documents – comes into play

Things that take half a dozen steps in other products take two steps in ours. Search results come up instantly and browsing them is a cinch. So is linking from Parker’s analysis to practice aids and cited primary source documents. Parker’s powerful, user-friendly search engine ensures that you quickly find what you need every time you visit Our Tax Research Library.

Parker Tax Research Library

Dear Tax Professional,

My name is James Levey, and a few years back I founded a company named Kleinrock Publishing. I started Kleinrock out of frustration with the prohibitively high prices and difficult search engines of BNA, CCH, and RIA tax research products ... kind of reminiscent of the situation practitioners face today.

Now that Kleinrock has disappeared into CCH, prices are soaring again and ease-of-use has fallen by the wayside. The needs of smaller firms and sole practitioners are simply not being met.

To address the problem, I’ve partnered with a group of highly talented tax writers to create Parker Tax Publishing ... a company dedicated to the idea that comprehensive, authoritative tax information service can be both easy-to-use and highly affordable.

Our product, the Parker Tax Pro Library, is breathtaking in its scope. Check out the contents listing to the left to get a sense of all the valuable material you'll have access to when you subscribe.

Or better yet, take a minute to sign yourself up for a free trial, so you can experience first-hand just how easy it is to get results with the Pro Library!

Sincerely,

James Levey

Parker Tax Pro Library - An Affordable Professional Tax Research Solution. www.parkertaxpublishing.com

    ®2012-2017 Parker Tax Publishing. Use of content subject to Website Terms and Conditions.

IRS Codes and Regs
Tax Court Cases IRS guidance