Professional Tax Research Solutions from the Founder of Kleinrock. tax research
Parkers Tax Library
Accounting News Tax Analysts professional tax research software Like us on Facebook Follow us on Twitter View our profile on LinkedIn Find us on Pinterest
CPA software
Professional Tax Software
tax and accounting
Tax Research Articles Tax Research Parker's Tax Research Articles Accounting Research CPA Client Letters Tax Research Software Client Testimonials Tax Research Software tax research


Accounting Software for Accountants, CPA, Bookeepers, and Enrolled Agents

CPA Tax Software

        

 

Tax Court Holds That Distinguished Artist's Work Was Not a Hobby.
(Parker Tax Publishing October 12, 2014)

The taxpayer's work as an artist was not a hobby and, thus, the losses from her artist business were not limited by the hobby loss rules; however, the court left for another day a decision on whether the taxpayer's expenses were deductible as ordinary and necessary business expenses. Crile v. Comm'r, T.C. Memo. 2014-202 (10/2/14).

Susan Crile has had a long, varied, and distinguished career as an artist. She has worked for more than 40 years in media that include oil, acrylic, charcoal, pastels, printmaking, lithograph, woodcut, and silkscreen. Her artwork hangs in the permanent collections of at least 25 museums including the Metropolitan Museum of Art, the Guggenheim Museum, the Brooklyn Museum of Art, the Phillips Collection, the Hirshhorn Museum, and art museums at eight colleges and universities. Many prominent corporations, law firms, and government entities have purchased her artwork as well. She is also a full-time tenured professor of studio art at Hunter College in New York City.

During the years at issue, 2004-2009, Susan actively marketed her artwork and was represented by galleries. She supplemented the galleries' efforts by sending exhibition announcements and other promotional materials to her mailing list of nearly 3,000 collectors. She regularly attended art-related events to network with collectors, journalists, and art professionals. She sold, directly or through galleries, a total of 356 works of art during 1971-2013. These sales generated gross proceeds of approximately $1,197,150. After subtracting gallery commissions and other deductions, Susan earned income of approximately $668,000 from sales of her art during these years. Despite substantial gross receipts, Susan has never reported a net profit from her art business.

For tax years 2004-2009, Susan reported wage income between $86,000 and $106,000, and she reported other taxable income (interest, dividends, capital gains, pensions, and social security payments) between $17,700 and $67,000. On her Schedules C, she reported income and claimed the expenses as deductions in connection with her activity as an artist during the years at issue, including expenses for travel, meals, entertainment, mortgage and utilities.

The IRS assessed a deficiency against Susan for years 2004-2009. First, the IRS determined that Susan's activity as an artist was an activity not engaged in for profit within the meaning of Code Sec. 183 and hence, she was not entitled to claim deductions in excess of the income she derived from her artist activity. Second, if Susan was engaged in a trade or business during the years at issue, the IRS contended that many of the deductions she claimed were not ordinary and necessary expenses incurred in carrying on that business.

The Tax Court rejected the IRS's argument that Susan's work as an artist was a hobby and held that that she was engaged in the trade or business of being an artist. In reaching its conclusion, the court evaluated the nine factors in Reg. Sec. 1.183-2(b) that are relevant in ascertaining whether a taxpayer conducted an activity with the intent to earn a profit. According to the court:

(1) Susan's marketing efforts demonstrated a profit objective and showed that she conducted her art activity in a business-like manner;

(2) Susan was without doubt an expert artist who understood the economics of her business;

(3) because Susan devoted roughly 30 hours per week to her art business during the academic year and worked on her art full time during the summer, she devoted substantial time and effort to her art business;

(4) Susan entertained a reasonable expectation that her artwork, over the course of her career, would appreciate significantly in value, and this expectation explained her willingness to continue to sustain operating losses;

(5) as far as Susan's success in other activities, the court found that factor to be of limited relevance but, to the extent it was relevant, it favored Susan;

(6) Susan's history of losses favored the IRS's position although the court was convinced that such losses did not negate Susan's actual and honest intent to profit from the sale of her art;

(7) Susan's minimal profits weighed in the IRS's favor but not terribly heavily;

(8) with respect to the factor of Susan's financial status and whether she lacked substantial income or capital from other sources than artist activity, the court said this factor was neutral; and

(9) Susan's enjoyment of her art activity was not sufficient to cause it to be classified as a hobby rather than a business.

The Tax Court did not address the IRS's second argument, saying the IRS's contentions concerning the substantiation of Susan's expenses, the character of those expenses as ordinary and necessary, and her liability for penalties and additions to tax would be resolved later.

For a discussion of the hobby loss rules and the factors a court will consider in determining if an activity is a hobby, see Parker Tax ¶97,505. (Staff Editor Parker Tax Publishing)

Disclaimer: This publication does not, and is not intended to, provide legal, tax or accounting advice, and readers should consult their tax advisors concerning the application of tax laws to their particular situations. This analysis is not tax advice and is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for purposes of avoiding tax penalties that may be imposed on any taxpayer. The information contained herein is general in nature and based on authorities that are subject to change. Parker Tax Publishing guarantees neither the accuracy nor completeness of any information and is not responsible for any errors or omissions, or for results obtained by others as a result of reliance upon such information. Parker Tax Publishing assumes no obligation to inform the reader of any changes in tax laws or other factors that could affect information contained herein.

Parker Tax Pro Library - An Affordable Professional Tax Research Solution. www.parkertaxpublishing.com


Professional tax research

We hope you find our professional tax research articles comprehensive and informative. Parker Tax Pro Library gives you unlimited online access all of our past Biweekly Tax Bulletins, 22 volumes of expert analysis, 250 Client Letters, Bob Jennings Practice Aids, time saving election statements and our comprehensive, fully updated primary source library.

Parker Tax Research

Try Our Easy, Powerful Search Engine

A Professional Tax Research Solution that gives you instant access to 22 volumes of expert analysis and 185,000 authoritative source documents. But having access won’t help if you can’t quickly and easily find the materials that answer your questions. That’s where Parker’s search engine – and it’s uncanny knack for finding the right documents – comes into play

Things that take half a dozen steps in other products take two steps in ours. Search results come up instantly and browsing them is a cinch. So is linking from Parker’s analysis to practice aids and cited primary source documents. Parker’s powerful, user-friendly search engine ensures that you quickly find what you need every time you visit Our Tax Research Library.

Parker Tax Research Library

Dear Tax Professional,

My name is James Levey, and a few years back I founded a company named Kleinrock Publishing. I started Kleinrock out of frustration with the prohibitively high prices and difficult search engines of BNA, CCH, and RIA tax research products ... kind of reminiscent of the situation practitioners face today.

Now that Kleinrock has disappeared into CCH, prices are soaring again and ease-of-use has fallen by the wayside. The needs of smaller firms and sole practitioners are simply not being met.

To address the problem, I’ve partnered with a group of highly talented tax writers to create Parker Tax Publishing ... a company dedicated to the idea that comprehensive, authoritative tax information service can be both easy-to-use and highly affordable.

Our product, the Parker Tax Pro Library, is breathtaking in its scope. Check out the contents listing to the left to get a sense of all the valuable material you'll have access to when you subscribe.

Or better yet, take a minute to sign yourself up for a free trial, so you can experience first-hand just how easy it is to get results with the Pro Library!

Sincerely,

James Levey

Parker Tax Pro Library - An Affordable Professional Tax Research Solution. www.parkertaxpublishing.com

    ®2012-2016 Parker Tax Publishing. Use of content subject to Website Terms and Conditions.

IRS Codes and Regs
Tax Court Cases IRS guidance